I got you there huh? With that catchy, or at least what I’d like to call catchy title? I was going for a tagline Alternative Thinking: A Prequel To Alternative Facts, you know because you can always think differently about the facts at hand but not necessarily change them, or alternate them like some people have been doing. You know just how much we are used to thinking normally, like we never really think you know, from other perspectives, it is like one of those weird other-worldly trips people talk of on psychedelic substances.
What’s the deal with North Korea? I mean, it is something we could be afraid of. Or possibly not because they just chose to mess with the world’s most powerful nuclear arsenal. But are they really? For a moment, I felt like the whole thing we have been told by the news to be propaganda. I’m not delusional, maybe a little but there was this reporter from Pyongyang on CNN who’d spoken to some locals of which one who was insistent on America being bullies and that North Korea will simply not beg for peace saying that they simply liked peace and that they had their children and people to take care of. You have probably heard of this interview if you watched CNN today, but you didn’t because you don’t watch the news or you’re a Trump supporter who only watches Fox, either way this was real. Continue reading “Alternative Thinking”
Before I begin, please don’t hate me – I am a scientist myself. I am not outright stating science is always subjective, instead I’m just trying to think and dissect further into certain areas of science that is only vaguely understood and then how people tend to force their subjectivism on others exploiting this lack of consensus.
poorly backed opinions get life when others don’t equally understand it, or lack the evidence to easily refute it
First we must try and answer when and why does science get subjective? Science is one of those things that simply cannot become subjective, it is in its very nature not to be. Practitioners of science simply do not buy into such premises, and we are trained not to because that’s simply not science anymore, its like one of those awful things called tarot cards or palm readings. A scientific consensus is reached only after the majority of scientists can agree upon something and say well this agrees with everything we have hypothesized so there is a very good chance our premise is valid. Continue reading “Is Science Just Subjective?”
Folks, today I want to document (this is really for my own future reference, or for the future me who will have had time-traveled, whichever comes first) the bargains we make, very sub-consciously toward happiness. Before you judge this article for being one of those lame posts on how to think positive, no, that certainly is not what you’re going to be finding in here.
The bargains (of happiness) are those you perform with little thought. You often see people from war-torn countries with little to no sense of empathy. One might satisfying conclude this person to be a psychopath. But they’re really not, these people have grown a skin, a metaphorical emotional shell so thick all around that nothing, good or bad can permeate through. It’s like the Trump wall, but a bargain with your self over Mexico. This so-called shell as I’d like to call it renders them incapable of showing any sense of appreciation for good, and equally not able to take in good given to them. Continue reading “The Bargain of Life”
Quick and short one. I was just wondering how people so often get away with exploiting us. The human psychology is one gullible piece of cake, people including you and me often fall prey to the dings on our phone, the tunes of some low-key DJ we’ve never before heard, or horror movies. That’s because we like to do the things that make us happy, and the people who market them to us in turn like the money. It’s mutual benefit, and that’s why we trade in the market. But this is going to be no lesson on trade. Continue reading “Exploiting Human Nature: Business”
So I was checking out my Instagram and ran into a post that said,
Fail seven times, rise the eighth
It’s funny that we’ve to fall seven times, it really is meant to be interpreted by people in their own ways. You don’t necessarily have to fall seven out of eight times, I mean because that would be silly, and maybe hysterical. Another one,
if you don’t sacrifice for what you want, what you want becomes the sacrifice
I’m sorry man, but I ain’t sacrificing nothing (pardon the southern dialect). Continue reading “Success!”
Today I am going to write about something a little controversial and what I’d like to call fancily the Information Loop. This loop represents every source we get our information from: news, answers to our crockery questions, and how to tie a tie, and by some magic the loop seems to have answers to all of them. I’m taking this up on myself to debate the intellectual effects from our reliance on this repository of knowledge.
Before I dive further, why call it a ‘loop’? And let me assure you I’d done a bit of thinking before calling dibs on ‘loop’. We are often inclined to believe what sources (of information) we chose to get our information from is solely per our discretion but is it really? The prerequisite of knowing where to get your information from is also information. You certainly wouldn’t be reading this if you hadn’t been informed of WordPress. If you’re still not seeing it, the information pertaining to the whereabouts of other sources of information is one that needs to be acquired from a source. There certainly is a hierarchy but it is also a source (of information) and follows suit until you establish yourself in a loop – where you get information from the same sources and turn to the same other sources for more information. Continue reading “The Information Loop: Intellectual Stimulation or Retardation?”
Really, why? And trust me, I’ve been thinking about that for a while now without reaching any satisfying explanation. For those of you who haven’t been to the Late Show when it was hosted by David Letterman or lately as of 2015, Stephen Colbert – it’s freezing in there, like nipples through your The North Face jacket cold. But I somehow didn’t feel bothered by it. Some people have called it the ‘refrigerator’, but that’s exactly what Letterman wanted, apparently.
When I first got tickets to the Late Show, which also happened to be my first time at the Late Show under Colbert’s tenure, I noticed something on the ticket about temperature. It said it was on the cooler end and we had to dress appropriately. The dress code then stated Broadway casual. I was more fixated on what ‘Broadway casuals’ meant, leaving little thought to the theatre’s environment. It was early into March and I had my trusty jacket on, so never bothered with carrying or putting on anything extra. Continue reading “It’s 55 °F at the Ed Sullivan theatre. Why?”
We are supposed to be talking logic this time. More specifically, I’d like to talk logic and people – how they use and understand logic.
While most people aren’t necessarily logical, they seem to have a decent grasp of what is logic. You and I are capable of everyday reasoning. But we find ourselves making decisions seeing past conventional logic – and it really has more to do with human psychology. Sometimes, nasty people exploit this loophole to win an argument, make a point, or even manipulate us like some theatrical puppet. Continue reading “Fifth Tangent”
Four nasty tangents and here we are, you and me – we aren’t normal. So, I believe I was talking good sleep. I cannot speak for everybody when it comes to a bodily function such as sleep. It is one that is heavily dependent on the person’s lifestyle. I will however, talk about how I manage to get some happy, sound and satisfying sleep. Continue reading “Fourth Tangent”
We made it! This tangent will explore entropy from a very philosophical standpoint (you’ll later understand why), therefore I won’t be spitting out equations unless I really have to, but let’s just hope it doesn’t come to that. So what is entropy? In all essential terms, entropy is really just the unique state of a system at some arbitrary time. This unique state can only move in one direction – from ordered to disordered as work is done by this system on its immediate surroundings. Entropy can move backwards – from disordered to ordered if work is done on the system by its surroundings. But what makes entropy truly fascinating and mysterious is it’s unpredictability – the quantum chaos observed in every system in the physical universe. This chaos is one that cannot be fully quantified because it would then violate the Second Law (of Thermodynamics) as we know it. Why does it violate said law? Because we can then turn back time, technically. By knowing the kinetic state and positions of particles in a system, we can easily treat the quantum particles as classical ones and apply our knowledge of classical mechanics to extrapolate the state of some particle in the system to some arbitrary time, which will allow us to manipulate the system’s disorderliness without doing any actual work on it – which is counter-intuitive and in violation of the Second Law.
Any system being governed by another entity cannot fully understand the entity that’s controlling it
Continue reading “Third Tangent”